Re: Woodlands improve health

On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:31:28 +0100, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <kdtve2tf27unp01k8k4k68evdglquh7ib0@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:53:14 +0100, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <66oue2p5602eiodjus0dmmggbvp9tlqlco@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:42:21 +0100, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <i4iue2h7eonrs34epe8ib6fc82vda27b91@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

These issues have been covered a many times on this ng and never
effectively disputed.

What a wonderful combination of blind panic and wishful thinking.

Not at all. You've been trying for years and only make yourself look
foolish.

Your
pronouncements have been effectively demolished time after time after
time. If they hadn't, you wouldn't still feel the need to keep repeating
them, would you?

Of course I would; I repeat them all over the place at every
opportunity.

If you felt it wasn't effective you wouldn't respond.

You very obviously think that I am very effective at demolishing your
arguments and pointing out the flaws in your claims.

But you haven't, over all the years.

So in that case why do you keep responding to me and why, for example,
do you attempt to denigrate me by posting your lies and libel about me
in several other newsgroups?

Like what? You denigrate yourself.

You wouldn't do that if I wasn't being
effective at countering your nonsense.

But you haven't ever countered any thing I have said effectively.

All you can do is repeat your old tired mantra of "the fakes are in
your mind" :-))

You really have a problem with this because you don't have an argument
against it. The reason they are fakes is that they say they are
conserving the natural environment but in reality they are indulging
in and encouraging environmentally damaging activities which make them
attractive to the general public. They also pump out masses of junk
mail and publications which are environmentally damaging in their
production, distribution and disposal and con the public into thinking
these are environmentally friendly by printing "100% recycled paper".
What a bunch of crooks these people really are!

But it doesn't stop there.

The whole conservation industry is a con from top to bottom!

The Kyoto Protocol scam got over 100 countries including the UK to
sign up to reducing emissions but excluded the emerging economies from
such limitations. Despite signing the commitment and making great
claims about it the UK is importing masses of produce from countries
of the emerging economies, so all that's happening is that we are
"exporting" our environmental so-called responsibilities to the likes
of China. Indeed, in Canada last year a last minute agreement was
manufactured to keep the scam going.

Another example of fake conservation was the RSPB's news release of
February 2005 in which they said "cooking our planet will disrupt and
devastate all life and giving this process the cosy name global
warming only makes it easier for all of us, especially politicians, to
ignore the consequences", yet at the same time they were accepting
pages of world wide travel advertisements in their Birds magazine. Is
there any reason I should not call into question the honesty of these
people and call them fakes? That's exactly what they are!

So Malcolm, wise up to the fact that the whole conservation industry
is bent from the top down and I've yet to see an exception.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Woodlands improve health
    ... The reason they are fakes is that they say they are ... conserving the natural environment but in reality they are indulging ... mail and publications which are environmentally damaging in their ... The whole conservation industry is a con from top to bottom! ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Woodlands improve health
    ... You denigrate yourself. ... You promote the fakes. ... conserving the natural environment but in reality they are indulging ... The whole conservation industry is a con from top to bottom! ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Woodlands improve health
    ... No it's not a lie. ... You promote the fakes. ... conserving the natural environment but in reality they are indulging ... The whole conservation industry is a con from top to bottom! ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Maine moves to cut greenhouse gases
    ... cultural environment, such ephemeral publications need to have an ... reduce the statewide emission of greenhouse gases. ... Maine's rule will impose stricter reporting requirements for a long ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Maine moves to cut greenhouse gases
    ... cultural environment, such ephemeral publications need to have an ... reduce the statewide emission of greenhouse gases. ... Maine's rule will impose stricter reporting requirements for a long ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)