Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: "John Morgan" <shirley.yu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:31:34 +0200
"Granville West" <granvillewest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de
news: 1150113918.386255.266980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
John Morgan wrote:
"Granville West" <granvillewest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de
news: 1149717070.485837.59040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You seem rather muted at the moment, Malcolm.
Your answer is required, think about it.
Granville
It was pointed out that this is seriously off topic, yet you goad another
poster into commiting this mis-demeanour. Do you have anything to write
about conservation, or are you simply another Peter Brook(e)s clone?
Off topic? Well you know what to do. Simple really, ignore the thread.
But I assume you must be the regulator for the NG.
Oh, really? It was your point about being this off-topic, Pete. By the way,
I think this latest name is just as idiotic as all the rest you used to
use.....Bishop Mbongo, Ivanna Humpalot, Judge Dred, Vicar Peter Parsnip,
etc. etc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: George
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- References:
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: Granville West
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: Granville West
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: John Morgan
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: Granville West
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- Prev by Date: Re: British Ruddy Ducks
- Next by Date: Re: British Ruddy Ducks
- Previous by thread: Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- Next by thread: Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|