Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: "Granville West" <granvillewest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Jun 2006 05:27:48 -0700
Malcolm wrote:
In article <1149676610.645688.257430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Granville West <granvillewest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
There was something in today's paper about the £200 billion of Scottish
BAC wrote:
<snippped>
Scotland may well be different, for all I know, given the superior free
public services they seem to be able to afford up there.
Free! Not so the rest of the UK is paying for it:-(
oil money that has been collected by the UK government, but I think that
this is getting seriously OT :-)
uk.rec.birdwatching trimmed
--
Malcolm
Nice one. I thought you'd bring "Scottish oil" into it:-0
Nothing of the sort the oil & gas was/is in International waters.
Nothing Scottish about it at all. The only reason Scotland benefited is
because it was the nearest place to pipe it to;-) Plus the oil
companies who did profit are Global not UK companies , albeit the UK
government profited (this includes Scotland and their Quango, the
Scottish assembly)
Granville
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: Granville West
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- Prev by Date: Re: What's causing the decline in St Kilda's birds?
- Next by Date: Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- Previous by thread: Garden Wildlife
- Next by thread: Re: Another AM lie. That's number 53,784
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
