Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds


"John Morgan" <shirley.yu@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:445790ce$0$295$7a628cd7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"BAC" <casswalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
1146499416.20194.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Malcolm" <Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4M67TL2$MgVEFwEb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In article <1146471786.26326.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, BAC
<casswalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes

"Malcolm" <Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mge8YiMp4iUEFwsv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In article <1146233081.39699.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, BAC
<casswalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes

"Malcolm" <Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0w24c8EItgUEFwuM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Good, because I certainly agree that, with two exceptions, the
posters
here are intelligent and honest.

Oh, dear. You are incorrigible.

Why, can you name a third???

I was referring to the implication that dissenters must be either
dishonest
or unintelligent, or both.

I didn't read any such implication, as Malcolm specified two posters not
classsified by him as intelligent and honest, while there are more than
two
dissenters on the ng.



So there are.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Zero avian flu risk from wild birds
    ... In article, BAC ... I was referring to the implication that dissenters must be either ... I didn't read any such implication, as Malcolm specified two posters not ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: What evidence exists?
    ... In message, BAC writes ... you might think it, he *is* being honest, IMO. ... dishonest in his postings here. ... I also find it dishonest to claim he has nothing against conservation only what he calls fake conservation but to never have named a form of conservation he approves of. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)