Re: A letter I agree with
- From: amacmil304@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:25:22 +0100
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:30:30 +0000, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <ul1h121883kjbp1j6kuk8tc7n4ro0al7v2@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
Which still does not explain how you know. It merely says you have read
the reports. Remember you suggested I read the reports and it didn't
say what you thought it would.
Of course it did. "A massive cull".
Angus I will give you the challenge again. Give me either keywords for
a search or references that point to a massive cull. All I found was
one headline by the BBC and many quotes of the headlines. None actually
gave figures and if you read the BBC report with an open mind (that will
be a first in your case) you will find they have done nothing more than
standard journalistic practice of an emotive headline and a more toned
down report.
IF you can supply either figures to back your massive cull or the
searches I ask for above fine I will check them. Until then my point
stands.
Merely saying it has been discussed in the past and you have read the
reports does not say how you know.
The reports could (and on your history probably did ) say something
entirely different to what you imply they do.
Not at all.
So tell me the reports so that I can verify your point or give me
keywords to search for.
Remember I don't need to do the research it is your assertion that the
point t is fact. If you can't offer either references or at the very
least searches which will verify your assertion then we must assume it
to be false.
See my previous posts in this regard.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Next by Date: Re: A letter I agree with
- Previous by thread: Re: A letter I agree with
- Next by thread: Yet another letter I agree with
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
