Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: "John Morgan" <shirley.yu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:43:05 +0200
"Malcolm" <Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
8rzKKZGeMbUEFw+k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
to
In article <44514f55$0$303$7a628cd7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Morgan
<shirley.yu@xxxxxxx> writes
"BAC" <casswalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
1146038563.13529.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My intended meaning was that a reliance on the belief that a bird was'wild'
would render a person 100% safe from infection from it was equivalent
personreliance on the belief that wearing a banana skin would protect a
thefrom contracting malaria.
Interesting. My intention was to ridicule the notion that efficient
protection could be deployed (e.g. snake oil remedy) when in fact it is
birds,risk equating to zero - or so close to zero that it can be discounted -
which protects the individual. You may have seen a proposal that we can
protect ourselves against bird 'flu by not going to reserves for wild
despite the fact that wild birds are everywhere around us.And despite the facts, which the proponent of the idea of not going to
reserves dishonestly tried to ignore, that at reserves people and birds
are separated while in town parks people feed wild birds by hand and
children play on paths and grass on which the birds have been walking
and crapping.
Indeed. I've already mentioned the St James Park wintering wildfowl as a
place where, unlike a reserve, the public actually mingle with the wild
birds. If there was thought to be any risk whatsoever to the public, these
would be the first places to be closed down.
There are probably more such parks up and down the land than there are
reserves holding migrant wildfowl. Yet so far no-one has suggested that the
public should be warned away from these places. Such scare-mongering would
probably be ridiculed anyway.
.
- References:
- Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: John Morgan
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: BAC
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: BAC
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: John Morgan
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: BAC
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: John Morgan
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: BAC
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: John Morgan
- Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Prev by Date: Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- Next by Date: Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Previous by thread: Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Next by thread: Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|