Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- From: "BAC" <casswalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:27:43 +0100
<amacmil304@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:937q42dur9c95anv65p6bq2jfe5tqvehor@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:24:59 +0100, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <1145896402.535659.55960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, J
Smith <birdingworld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
I'd prefer the RSPB to use their resources for a better use thanSO would I but as long as you have idiots like Angus around there will
insignificant studies such as this!
JS
have to be efforts to provide evidence to counter act his lies.
Tut Tut. Abuse :-))
He can't really imagine that the 'study' was a direct response to your
campaigns, can he? After all, you've been saying for ages that one of the
prime motivations of the nature conservation lobby (especially the RSPB) has
been the exploitation of the conserved populations as tourist resources, and
the exercise reported seems to have been designed to illustrate just how
successfully that has been achieved.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- References:
- Angus will be delighted :-)
- From: Malcolm
- Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- From: J Smith
- Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- From: amacmil304
- Angus will be delighted :-)
- Prev by Date: Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- Next by Date: Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Previous by thread: Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- Next by thread: Re: Angus will be delighted :-)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|