Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: amacmil304@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:26:46 +0100
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:05:17 +0100, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <444b201c$0$303$7a628cd7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Morgan
<shirley.yu@xxxxxxx> writes
The number of human cases of avian 'flu world-wide, attributable to wildAnd, of course, that zero includes people who regularly handle wild
birds, is currently put at zero. In assessing risk, this would be the
figure, suitably scaled, that would be used to calculate human risk.
Multiplication of the numerator of a fraction by zero does not require too
much knowledge of Arithmetic to work out. An 'O' grade should be enough.
birds of all kinds. I wonder how many people there are worldwide who
shoot and trap birds to eat, not just handling them themselves, but
transporting them to market where they will be handled by those selling
them as well as by those buying them and plucking and gutting them - it
could run into hundreds of millions, and wildfowl will figure large in
their quarry. Yet, as you say, there's not a single case of a human
catching avian flu from a wild bird.
Yet.
That really does put things into perspective, doesn't it?
The unexpected can happen at any time. Staying away from birds
reserves in an area where the infection has been identified is a
prudent suggestion.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- References:
- Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- From: John Morgan
- Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Prev by Date: Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Next by Date: Re: Bird Flu restrictins ended.
- Previous by thread: Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Next by thread: Re: Zero avian 'flu risk from wild birds
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|