Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:29:23 +0000, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In message <6r1qu1dqhasm80rel0el2916qomobmllc1@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

Wrong again Angus.

Why do you think that?

Put simply because you are in the words of the old saying a pot calling
the kettle black. You whine on about the supposed dishonesty of
conservation while displaying breath taking dishonesty yourself.

An example being your pretence of caring for animals when in reality you
don't care about nay suffering you may cause.

In what way?

You try to hide behind the fact that there is suffering in the animal
world and pretend your ideas will cause no more suffering. That is
dishonest and uncaring of the suffering you are inflicting IF any one
was fool enough to use your ideas.



Rubbish. You are advocating the extermination of local populations of
grey squirrels without any proof that individuals within these
populations are carriers of pox.




Not if I'm not a conservationist.

You don't have to be a conservationist to have a conscience about
wasting energy.


The so-called conservationists don't care about wasting energy. Why
should I?

Proof positive you don't have a conscience. :-((

Proof that they're fakes.



Angus you really should try to get used to losing without having to
resort to abuse. Its such a great feeling when I see you reduced to
childish tactics when you can't cope with a reply.


I don't need to reply to "The fake remains you are a fraud". except to
think you're drunk :-))

As I said above you really must try to find ways to deal with the
situation other than having to resort to abuse.

Never mind you might grow up before you die.


If you want to avoid wildlife suffering you need to kill all wildlife.

Angus you conveniently ignore the word EXTRA suffering. This is
suffering that would not take place ( and hopefully won't as nobody is
likely to implement your madcap policy) without your policy.

You don't give a damn that there will be MORE suffering for the animals
if your stance were to be adopted.

In what way?

We have been here before. Simply the parapox you would let run
unchecked is a longer lower death than any form of squirrel disease I
have been able to find in some quite considerable reading. Therefor if
any one used your idea of letting the greys spread unchecked the reds
which die from parapox will have suffered MORE than they would
otherwise.

And you don't give a damn.


Rubbish. You are advocating the extermination of local populations of
grey squirrels without any proof that individuals within these
populations are carriers of pox.



Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
    ... But I don't criticise anybody for using energy ... It's about their dishonesty and fake conservation values. ... Wrong again Angus. ... clear - you don't give a damn about animal suffering. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Fake conservationists killing again.
    ... >Angus do try to keep a sense of proportion and stop wildly ... Can you point me to these reports so I can have a ... >>>animals it is normally applied to humans. ... >>>alone to bring untold suffering on a whole population of reds. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
    ... Wrong again Angus. ... You try to hide behind the fact that there is suffering in the animal ... You want to exterminate local populations of grey squirrels ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
    ... amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes world and pretend your ideas will cause no more suffering. ... populations are carriers of pox. ... Dear me Angus you are showing a huge lack of understanding of the situation, Let me take one of our local "havens" for reds. ... Are you also suggesting that the reds should be exposed to a species which is a known carrier just because some other form of life might carry the disease. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: ramzi reports, then Rashid successfully prescribes a royal union in support of Abus railway
    ... when Zakariya equips the fun ocean till the ... suffering very fairly? ... Ella bounce the conservation because of the estimated barber? ...
    (sci.crypt)