Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
- From: amacmil304@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:47:03 +0000
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:09:23 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <cq79u1dfa4vuu4brkauuo7ind4scc6onsc@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
This is quite an interesting letter.Please note, there is no such thing as a "fake conservation
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,59-2023757,00.html
Not to be cynical:-)
It seems that oil companies are quite willing to fund projects by fake
conservation organisations for publicity purposes that give the
impression of benefiting the environment but when it comes down to
funding research that might not go in their favour there is a
reluctance to be involved.
organisation" except in your mind.
Fake conservation organisations are easly recognisable as ones that
indulge in and encourage environmentally damaging activities in the
name of conservation.
However, your role as a fake critic
of conservation is very well known.
No Malcolm, If I'm well known, and it's nice of you to say so, it's
for exposing fake conservationists.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
- References:
- Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
- From: amacmil304
- Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
- Prev by Date: Re: Dazzled by their own importance?
- Next by Date: Re: Red Squirrels - Commonest in the world
- Previous by thread: Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
- Next by thread: Re: Oil companies quite willing to fund the fakes?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
