Re: Red Squirrels - Commonest in the world



On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:19:28 +0000, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>In message <nlaqt15utjhernmj6gm4h9dl8n1t02n7oq@xxxxxxx>,
>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:37:37 +0000, Malcolm Kane
>><malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>In message <h55qt1ln1nrblu2hj1se8hd28oaa6bll2m@xxxxxxx>,
>>>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:15:41 +0000, Malcolm
>>>><Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In article <0vrpt198ifj192p4ttof6s4cht9e8dds09@xxxxxxx>,
>>>>>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>>>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:22:39 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>>><Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In article <dl2pt1h7l307f7cb78pl3c6g7vq846q71k@xxxxxxx>,
>>>>>>>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Guess who's destroying the red squirrels' habitat in the UK?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-44-2012976-44,00.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The fake conservationistst who cut down conifers and plant broadleafs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're being very selective in your comments, Angus, as you always are.
>>>>>>>You can't say you don't know about the extensive programme by genuine
>>>>>>>conservationists (the only sort) to try and restore the Caledonian pine
>>>>>>>forest as you have commented on it in the past. This is ideal Red
>>>>>>>Squirrel habitat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So has the red population increased as a result?
>>>>>>
>>>>>The project has only just got under way, so it needs time. Even you
>>>>>ought to know how long it takes trees to grow. Hence the urgency in
>>>>>preventing the Scottish red squirrel population from dying out because
>>>>>of the invading greys.
>>>>
>>>>So it's got no bearing on the red population. It's more about
>>>>bolstering the identity crisis of Scottishness :-(
>>>
>>>Angus do you never worry about demeaning your self by pretending to be
>>>so thick? Of course it does. However it is long term.
>>
>>The Caledonian forest was never re-planted to benefit red squirrels.
>
>Strange Angus you never queried the fact when Malcolm first mentioned
>it. Why do you suppose it is being recreated then?
>

See my reply to Malcolm O

>>
>>>
>>>By the way do a little bit of research on reds and conifers and I think
>>>you will find that they are mainly important because the reds can
>>>utilise them in a way greys can't.
>>
>>And the fake conservationists like the Woodland Trust cut them down.
>
>Angus you again deliberately ignore the point. You are whining on about
>the need for conifers. The need would be much less if there were no
>greys. The conifers are mainly important because of the greys. With
>out the greys they are quite happy with mixed woodland and even broad
>leaf woods. (but admittedly not as happy).

But there are greys.


>
>As a fake you conveniently ignore this as it doesn't fit in with your
>preconceived ideas.

No.

>
>
>>
>>> Yes some conifers are needed in red
>>>habitat but reds can and do make use of broad leafed woodland if there
>>>are no greys. The importance of conifers are mainly as an additional
>>>protection against the incursion of greys into red areas.
>>>
>>
>>And the fake conservationists like the Woodland Trust cut them down.
>
>Angus do try to get a grip. Conservationists can remove conifers as
>they aren't essential to reds. Secondly they aren't removing them where
>reds are they are removing them in areas where they are damaging other
>wildlife. Why do you always pretend you are so thick you don't
>understand. Nobody is likely to be fooled by your over simplifications.
>Sadly for you.

Reds could expand or be introduced if suitable habitats were left
alone.

>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Doubtless, in your ignorance, you will think it should happen instantly,
>>>>>just as you appeared to think puffins would return to Ailsa Craig and
>>>>>Lundy the moment the last rat disappeared. Fortunately, the genuine
>>>>>conservationists involved know more about such things than a fake like
>>>>>you.
>>>>
>>>>No Malcolm. The fakes are the so-called conservationists that killed
>>>>the rats that ate the rabbits on the tourist venue that Landmark
>>>>built. That's real ignorance.
>>>
>>>You are showing real ignorance Angus. The problem is a reduction in the
>>>rabbit population not an increase. Do you have any evidence of rats
>>>taking rabbits as prey. I can't find a single reference to rabbits as a
>>>prey for rats.
>>
>>You're showing yours. Dr Thick referred to an October press release
>>showing that to be the case. Look it up.
>
>I will.

Good


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Excellent new from the Scottish Executive
    ... Of course I do but NOT to the extent of killing the greys. ... Yes, Angus, and I responded to your statement that you do care about the ... red but not if it involves killing greys ("but NOT to ... I understand not ALL reds succumb to pox and if, ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Fake conservationists killing again.
    ... That is part of your fake stance. ... >Yet another illustration of your fake stance Angus. ... >lay the reds open to infection from greys. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Red Squirrels - Commonest in the world
    ... in the UK reds are capable of spreading. ... Not even the areas round here which are wall to wall conifers measuring a few miles across? ... If they are why aren't they expanding in these areas? ... are used as a protection from greys as they don't utilise them as well ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: It the M1 part of nature?
    ... >>>people calling them tree rats long before many of the conservation ... >>Are the reds any less tree rats than the greys? ... >Angus can you explain how this address the fact that for 4 or 5 decades ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Red Squirrels - Commonest in the world
    ... The conifers are mainly important because of the greys. ... habitat but reds can and do make use of broad leafed woodland if there are no greys. ... Secondly they aren't removing them where reds are they are removing them in areas where they are damaging other wildlife. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)