Re: Conservation or Management
- From: Peter <PBrookes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:38:25 +0000
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:20:29 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>In article <1133210480.9374.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, BAC
><casswalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>>
>>I agree, by the way, that Angus would be better off concentrating his fire
>>on people who are likely to wield some favourable influence in his chosen
>>areas of interest. I suspect he continues to post here, primarily to annoy
>>you and Malcolm O :-)
>>
>Nothing he posts here annoys me.
Everything he does annoys you, why else would you spend 24/7 trying to
get your own back?
>It often amuses me
Sure have us fooled.
> and very often
>amuses other people, too.
When he makes you and your weird friends look daft LOL.
>There's a lot of pleasure watching someone dig
>holes for themselves and then, when challenged, dig them deeper still
>:-)
Oh we know the feeling LOL. Let us know when you reach Ramsey Street.
.
- References:
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: BAC
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: BAC
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: BAC
- Re: Conservation or Management
- Prev by Date: Re: Conservation or Management
- Next by Date: Re: Conservation or Management
- Previous by thread: Re: Conservation or Management
- Next by thread: Re: Conservation or Management
- Index(es):