Re: Conservation or Management
- From: amacmil304@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:32:55 +0000
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:29:31 +0000, Malcolm Kane
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>In message <lptao1td7bgjvmsn22au8tkbksjgseq47c@xxxxxxx>,
>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:47:40 +0000, Malcolm Kane
>><malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>In message <a5s9o19tuurvj4p12pcjoj9aneq874nf57@xxxxxxx>,
>>>amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
>>>>
>>>>You support the so-called conservationists' nazi principles against
>>>>wildlife that Hitler and his thugs did against the Jews.
>>>
>>>Animals are NOT human so it is NOT the same principle.
>>
>>Humans are animals.
>
>Biologically yes but that doesn't answer the point. You are suggesting
>that treating animals in any way is the same as treating humans. It
>isn't. They are not of the same species as us and we are the top of
>almost any food chain, web of life etc. that you care to think of.
If we're top of the food chain as you suggest then we are no more than
animals. But I doubt if you're really correct in this matter. I would
imaging that bacteria might have one over on us.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> You support
>>>>extermination of so-called "aliens".
>>>
>>>Not so called aliens they ARE aliens.
>>>
>>
>>They are not alien to the planet
>
>Oh I am sorry Angus. I was unaware that you understood so little of
>conservation terminology. Alien in conservation (and in fact probably a
>living things terms) means something different. Hence the term Alien
>Big Cats.
So-called conservationists obviously picked the term to alienate the
public against "non-native" species they wish to exterminate.
>
>When you post to a conservation group you need to make sure you are
>aware of the relevant terminology.
>
Not if you don't agree with it.
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>No, Angus, it isn't. If you think it is, then this merely demonstrates
>>>>>how warped your ideas have become.
>>>>
>>>>It's exactly the same principle.
>>>
>>>No Angus it isn't animals are NOT human.
>>>
>>
>>Humans are animals.
>
>That has nothing to do with it. Animals are not human and so do not get
>treated in the same way as humans would.
But in the main they do. Humans are slaughtered daily by extremists
just as animals are
>The same is true within
>humans some groups aren't treated the same as others.
>
Same as animals! Some are protected ;some are not.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>As I've said before, if you were persecuting humans the same as
>>>>>>willdlife you'd be in jail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>But I'm not. Your comparisons just become more and more meaningless.
>>>>
>>>>Read what I wrote and don't jump to conclusions.The reason you're not
>>>>in jail is because you're not persecuting humans
>>>
>>>Wow you are finally beginning to realise animals don't have the same
>>>rights and protection as humans.
>>
>>Tell that to the innocemt people bombed in Iraq by Blair & Bush.
>
>I suspect they would understand the statement but why should I bother
>them with it?
I suspect they'd see through you.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: BAC
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Conservation or Management
- References:
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Conservation or Management
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Conservation or Management
- Prev by Date: Re: Conservation or Management
- Next by Date: Re: Conservation or Management
- Previous by thread: Re: Conservation or Management
- Next by thread: Re: Conservation or Management
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|