Re: Conservation Nazis

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:07:40 +0100, "Philip Hart"
<auld.p.hart@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
><amacmil304@xxxxxxx> regressing to being foolish once more wrote:
>fgnen1letdp9huqr0uufnes9co3mbns1jc@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:13:52 +0100, "Philip Hart"
>> <auld.p.hart@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> >> >Well, squirrels are actually being farmed. Probably very, very cruelly
>by
>> >a
>> >> >Mr Wong from Shanghai who also farms dogs, cats, cows and sheep. Oh,
>and
>> >> >pigs.
>> >>
>> >> Probably so, although I've never heard of Mr Wong and his activities.
>> >
>> >Neither have I but it's a pretty good guess, wouldn't you agree? ;-)
>>
>> So you wern't telling the truth - again.
>
>The truth or otherwise of my statement vis-a-vis the actual names of animal
>torturers residing in Shanghai cannot be easily determined. Therefore I can
>hardly said to be lying - rather speculating. Your use of the word "again"
>is similar as you have yet to post any lies that you claim I have told. In
>essence, you are lying about me lying until such time incontrovertible proof
>one way or the other appears

But you were lying. You stated the name of one who you said was acting
cruelly.
>
>> Different people and organisations target different issues. Just look
>> at their websites. I have never targeted farming and equally others
>> have never targeted hunting and shooting.
>
>If you are claiming that your "campaign" targets hunting, shooting and
>fishing you can have no quibble with culling environmentally dangerous
>species. So why isn't your invective appearing on the Usenet groups
>dedicated to these pursuits?

I don't target fishing and \I take the view that if we don't cull the
most environmentally damaging species of all time - man - we should
not cull anything.

>
>Are you against the move to exterminate African bees in the southern USA?
>How about the killing of Cane Toads in Australia? These are not "fluffy" and
>they can and do kill people and pets. How would you feel if your pet cats
>and dogs rolled over dead after biting into a cane toad, never mind one of
>your kids suffering the same fate. My guess is that you would be out there
>screaming for the government to eradicate the beasts.

You're wrong. I would kill an animal if it was attacking me and
threatening my life and I would expect it to do the same. But I would
not kill an animal because it killed a pet or member of my family out
of revenge. I certainly wouldn't expect the species to be eradicated.

>
>Some of us feel the same way about Red Squirrels and White-headed Ducks that
>you probably feel about your cats, dogs and kids. So we do what we think is
>called for - exactly the same procedure that you would insist on for the
>Cane Toads that killed your pet.
>

Rubbish. I wouldn't have a fox shot if it killed one of my cats.


><snip>
>
>> >So the British government is covertly supporting and subsidising a "nazi"
>> >movement is it? Does Tony Blair realise this? Have you explained it all
>to
>> >him and his cabinet? Did you explain it to John Major and Margaret
>Thatcher
>> >in an ealier epoch?
>>
>> No they're not! They're openly supporting the nazi principled fake
>> conservationists.
>
>Then take your ranting directly to ministers of the crown or to your MP.
>

I'd rather attack the nazis directly but I do attack the government on
other platforms.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Two Very Odd and Unexplainable Things Happened In Instances
    ... OR> leader, a mechano walking towards us, the mechano is marked as the ... OR> I then press my "attack" key for my pet to attack the mechano and the ... OR> easy to see a skull on your target. ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Two Very Odd and Unexplainable Things Happened In Instances
    ... OR> leader, a mechano walking towards us, the mechano is marked as the ... OR> I then press my "attack" key for my pet to attack the mechano and the ... OR> easy to see a skull on your target. ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Changes on the 4.2 PTR
    ... The Aggressive pet stance has been removed and replaced with the ... This stance will cause the player's pet to attack the ... attacks a new target for a few seconds. ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: Change in picking targets with WotLK
    ... due to your pet rushing into places ... defensive and press attack. ... behavior back whereas it was possible to write a macro to get the ... It seems that there is no target after the target is dead and it is ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: [4e] question about wizards
    ... However, as Henry Lockwood said in his reply, the published wizard does have ... Attack: Intelligence vs. ... The target is slowed. ... So it's a daily power, and I don't know if there are non-damaging powers ...
    (rec.games.frp.dnd)