Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: Malcolm Kane <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:57:06 +0100
In message <crrug1pn9t4307ihl20gds32a0j12gpeqg@xxxxxxx>, amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
Malcolm, my remark was made in the context of woodlands and how capers are being disturbed by people using pathways and tracks whicis contributing to their demise. In the same context just how many anomals in a woodland welcolme man's intrusion? Most if not all flee from man.
So are you saying the research is flawed?
The comment above is suggests you mean all wildlife. Do you? -- Malcolm Kane .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- References:
- Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: Malcolm Kane
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Threatened capercaillies
- Prev by Date: Re: Threatened capercaillies
- Next by Date: Re: Threatened capercaillies
- Previous by thread: Re: Threatened capercaillies
- Next by thread: Re: Threatened capercaillies
- Index(es):