Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: Malcolm Kane <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:06:43 +0100
In message <dshsg1p736agtj1rmtng3lc489bfko9uaj@xxxxxxx>, amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
As I said in another post do a bit of research round ducks and the word decoy.On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:41:58 +0100, "BAC" <casswalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<amacmil304@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:llopg11r559lgm758gal30v2rdu6jduppr@xxxxxxxxxxOn Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:14:39 +0100, Malcolm <Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >In article <l0bng1ps1m5s3db7v2flbhk4pmkc07n68i@xxxxxxx>, >amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes >>Research has shown that capercaillies are avoiding areas of woodland >>adjacent to tracks and paths that people use. >> >>All wildlife avoids people and their dogs. > >Which is one of the most stupid remarks you have ever made, just >reeking of bias and ignorance.
No Malcolm.
If you had said something like 'it isn't uncommon for wildllife to be wary of humans and their dogs', you might not be being attacked on this particular tack. Especially in respect of game birds - after all, people have been using dogs to flush game birds out of cover for ages.
Yes but they don't fly towards the dogs they fly away.
--
Malcolm Kane
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: BAC
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- References:
- Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: BAC
- Re: Threatened capercaillies
- From: amacmil304
- Threatened capercaillies
- Prev by Date: Re: Threatened capercaillies
- Next by Date: Re: Threatened capercaillies
- Previous by thread: Re: Threatened capercaillies
- Next by thread: Re: Threatened capercaillies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|