Re: History of the IT curriculum
- From: Qercus editor <editor@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:03:55 +0100
In article
<1hgs72q.1o76dyseazmpoN%real-not-anti-spam-address@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi - are there any good accounts of the way IT has been taught in
schools in the UK over the past 30 years?
Not yet. I know someone who is working on it.
Much of the story is told by the magazines of the time. We have a full series
of Acorn User / BBC Acorn User magazine from its start 24 years ago and you're
welcome to use those as reference for your research. Interested? ;-)
I'm particularly interested in two things - firstly, how the subject
passed from being the domain of enthusiast and computer scientsts, with
the agenda being led by (for example) the BBC and schools resourced by
home-grown companies like Acorn, to being driven by govenment policy
without much actual understanding of IT itself, and becoming a huge
market for the likes of Microsoft and following a very corporate,
vocationally-oriented agenda.
You won't get the full story.
Secondly, I wonder what the cause and effect relationship with that and
the National Curriculum was. Was the NC a cause? Or was it all going to
go that way anyway? Looking back it seems extraordinary that the BBC was
the main player in computers and education for so long.
Hardly extraordinary. The Acorn BBC 8 bit computers were superseded by the
Acorn BBC 32 bit (Archimedes RISC) series of computer. Both series gave
excellent service and beat the opposition hands down. Both stood up to the
rigours of school life and lasted far longer than any other. Both had
specifications that exceeded the alternatives for most applications. Both had
software that was available at low cost with minimal site licence charges. The
question that you need to ask is why was the latter series dropped by most
schools when curriculum and cost would have kept them.
The Acorn RISC machines are still capable of delivering the curriculum (some
would say better than many of the alternatives that are used) so that isn't
the reason. When most schools changed they were far better than the
alternatives at delivering the curriculum.
--
John Cartmell - Qercus magazine - editor AT qercus.com www.qercus.com
Qercus: a fusion of Acorn Publisher & Acorn User magazines
Finnybank Ltd 30 Finnybank Rd Sale M33 6LR == 0845 006 8822
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: History of the IT curriculum
- From: D.M. Procida
- Re: History of the IT curriculum
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about exam marking
- Next by Date: Re: History of the IT curriculum
- Previous by thread: Question about exam marking
- Next by thread: Re: History of the IT curriculum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|