Re: Creationism is religion not science


"Old Boy" <mazoldboy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143037201.455457.164500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Interesting article at The First Post www.thefirstpost.co.uk
(http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=1&subID=363) -
Creationism is religion not science

I agree, creationism is a religious ideology, but then teaching evolution as
scientific fact stems from the equally religious ideology of scientism, it
is certainly not the objective science that I understand science to be. In
the debate I have not yet come across a comparative approach. eg We used to
say Avogadro's Hypothesis, but now it appears to be a Law, like the Law of
Levers. What about the Atomic Theory, or the Electron Theory of Metals, or
the neutrino hypothesis? How do they compare to the Theory (ies?) of
Evolution? What criteria must we draw upon to make the comparisons? Barry AC


.

Relevant Pages