Re: looking for penpals
- From: "gertie@grumbles" <gertie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:49:39 +0100
In article <rhamj1tutnupkp3hed7qqe9a1i1l4fm8le@xxxxxxx>, Guess who
<notreally.here@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:48:23 +0100, "gertie@grumbles"
> <gertie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I just thought you were making an unreasonable requirement
> It wasn't a requirement, it was an option. The point was to be sure
> that the person was legitimately a teacher and making a legitimate
> request. That's all.
Yes it was.
This is what you said:
> > > They must have a legitimate website with a staff listing.
The word 'must' is an imperative.
--
Gertie.
Award-winning bog cleaner, Latin scholar and beer festival organiser.
Veni, vidi, Vici iiabui et cervaca, or summat like that
reply-to address works but not to html mail, hotmail or aol addresses
The hardness of the butter is proportional to the softness of the bread.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: looking for penpals
- From: Guess who
- Re: looking for penpals
- References:
- looking for penpals
- From: Virginie Guillemine
- Re: looking for penpals
- From: Guess who
- Re: looking for penpals
- From: gertie@grumbles
- Re: looking for penpals
- From: Guess who
- Re: looking for penpals
- From: gertie@grumbles
- Re: looking for penpals
- From: Guess who
- looking for penpals
- Prev by Date: Re: looking for penpals
- Next by Date: Re: detention
- Previous by thread: Re: looking for penpals
- Next by thread: Re: looking for penpals
- Index(es):