Re: May be of interest
- From: Rebeils42@xxxxxxx
- Date: 22 Apr 2007 08:36:13 -0700
On Apr 22, 3:41�am, Bev <b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sandi warbled...> Feel free to list them.
Gosh Sandi! Have you been lurking *all* this time or is that some trick
of that website?
I see you still aren't considering that there could possibly be *any*
other opinion than yours.
I shan't be entering into a pointless argument with you because you do
not listen to another point of view anyway.
--
Bev.
I generally only look at the title headers and then go away. Couldn't
post till I got what you call broadband since AOL got rid of its
groups thingy. Didn't want to either as much of it didn't interest
me.
I see you have no answer, so I shall leave it as well. For the record,
after reading your comment, I did have a solicitor (British) friend
look it over to check for contradictory comments. He also checked to
see if it could be libelous. He said no to both. He's seen the main
log and evidence, though.
.
- References:
- May be of interest
- From: Ellie
- Re: May be of interest
- From: Ellie
- Re: May be of interest
- From: Rebeils42
- May be of interest
- Prev by Date: Re: May be of interest
- Next by Date: Re: May be of interest
- Previous by thread: Re: May be of interest
- Next by thread: Re: May be of interest
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
