Re: Lopsided brolly please!
- From: tuppence <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:06:50 +0100
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:14:05 +0100, JoL a gribouillé dans la poussière...
>
>"tuppence" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:voiog11bgt3uhv8qgl2rvit4ansn4c3ggn@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:14:01 +0100, JoL a gribouillé dans la poussière...
>>
>>>Why are brollys designed so that half of the brolly is useless (i.e.
>>>sticks
>>>out in front of you keeping the floor dry) rather than keeping me dry? I
>>>have a soggy back now :o(
>>
>> Try holding it behind your back or molish a device to fix it to which sits
>> on your shoulders.
>I think the best solution overall would be a big dome (think like eden
>project) over where I live and work!! ;o)
Hmm, ok if you don't want any real flowers and veg.
--
2d
Some mistakes are too much fun to make only once.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lopsided brolly please!
- From: JoL
- Re: Lopsided brolly please!
- References:
- Lopsided brolly please!
- From: JoL
- Re: Lopsided brolly please!
- From: tuppence
- Re: Lopsided brolly please!
- From: JoL
- Lopsided brolly please!
- Prev by Date: Re: net radio
- Next by Date: Re: David Bailey?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lopsided brolly please!
- Next by thread: Re: Lopsided brolly please!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|