Re: Gasping
- From: "Ellie" <Ellie@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:44:32 +0100
"tuppence" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eesjg1hum1b5vvuihqh5th295jpbgk2ukg@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:44:12 +0100, Sheel a gribouillé dans la
> poussière...
>
>>tuppence burbled:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:35:44 +0100, Sheel a gribouillé dans la
>>>poussière...
>>>>What quality do the pics have to be?
>>>
>>>Um, they get resized to 640 pixels on the longest size so I tend to
>>>submit
>>>them at that size and about 85% compressed which doesn't show significant
>>>loss. I also "sharpen" and increase contrast a bit (and sometimes mess
>>>with
>>>the gamma if it was a really dull day) - stick some up and we'll
>>>criticise
>>>:)
>>
>>I charged my camera battery up last night and it puddled down all day
>>today, so I'll try again tomorrow.
>
> Hmm, lightweight - are you water-soluble?
You think it would be that easy??
--
Ellie
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gasping
- From: Liz
- Re: Gasping
- References:
- Re: Gasping
- From: Liz
- Re: Gasping
- From: Liz
- Re: Gasping
- Prev by Date: Re: net radio
- Next by Date: Re: Gasping
- Previous by thread: Re: Gasping
- Next by thread: Re: Gasping
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|