Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators
- From: "Jo Ling" <donald.duck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:50:26 -0000
"Pierian Spring" <aiyr.r.bean@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134298235.001223.302830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Your remark would be correct only if the person whom you are
> quoting intended that you would pause after you had
> read his word, "spelling".
>
> However, is there one rule for you and a different rule for
> the person whom you are quoting?
>
> By the rule that you suggested, your sentence, "That should
> have had a comma after "spelling".", should have had a
> comma after, "after".
By the way, you don't need a comma after "after" there.
>
> (EOE :-) )
>
> Ian Johnston wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:39:36 UTC, "John Porcella"
>> <bronson69@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> : If you are so ignorant of English grammar and/or spelling you should
>> not
>> : post on Usenet.
>>
>> That should have had a comma after "spelling".
> --
>
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Algebra at Primary School
- Next by Date: Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators
- Previous by thread: Algebra at Primary School
- Next by thread: Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|