Re: Critical but stable
- From: Peter Duncanson <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:53:59 +0100
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:44:31 +0100, "Ildhund" <jnllb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Peter Duncanson wrote...
Wikipedia has an article on this subject:...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_state
most NHS Trusts will specify some[4] or all[5] of the following...
phrases in their guidance;
* Critical...
* Critical but stable
Thank you, Peter. I think it's very sad that established authorities
perpetuate the bad language they never learnt to recognize.
I sympathise with your point but I also sympathise with the authorities.
They need to have words and phrases that communicate the desired general
concepts to the general public. These words and phrases need not be
pedant-proof.
At least they aren't using a colour code for the conditions.
Let's see what I can invent:
Black: Deceased
Double Red: Critical
Red: Critical but stable
Double Amber: Stable
Amber: Satisfactory
Green-Amber: Comfortable
Green: Progressing well
White: Discharged
--
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.culture.language.english)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Critical but stable
- From: Ildhund
- Re: Critical but stable
- From: Mike Barnes
- Re: Critical but stable
- From: Molly Mockford
- Re: Critical but stable
- References:
- Critical but stable
- From: Ildhund
- Re: Critical but stable
- From: Theo Markettos
- Re: Critical but stable
- From: Ildhund
- Re: Critical but stable
- From: Peter Duncanson
- Re: Critical but stable
- From: Ildhund
- Critical but stable
- Prev by Date: Re: Critical but stable
- Next by Date: Re: Critical but stable
- Previous by thread: Re: Critical but stable
- Next by thread: Re: Critical but stable
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading