Re: Big numbers
- From: Molly Mockford <nospamnobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:07:18 +0100
At 15:22:29 on Sun, 12 Oct 2008, David M <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in <slrngf4215.oq2.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
We already often informally use 'k' (kilo) for 1000, and, conveniently,
the symbol for mega- (M) is the same as that used for 'million'. Given
that our computers have increasingly large hard disks, we're all pretty
familiar with G/giga and T/tera as well (and I dare say peta- and so on
soon enough), I don't see why, as we start to encounter scarily
ever-larger numbers, we don't just use the SI prefixes for money as
well (eg, $3T = "three tera-dollars")? These have clearly-defined
meanings and so there is no risk of confusion.
Well, the "informal" use of K for 1000 very neatly demonstrates the problem with your proposal. If I applied for, and got, a job which was advertised at a salary of £30K, I would be somewhat miffed if I ended up with only £30,000 instead of £30,720! (Especially since any job that I applied for would be in the world of computing.)
If we follow your suggestion and simply redefine K as 1,000, M as 1,000,000 etc., it does rather echo the urban legend that Alabama legislated to change the value of pi to 3.
--
Molly Mockford
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Big numbers
- From: John Hall
- Re: Big numbers
- References:
- Big numbers
- From: Ildhund
- Big numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Big numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Big numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Big numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Big numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|