Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- From: Richard Polhill <richard.news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:05:08 +0100
John Briggs wrote:
FCS wrote:On Jul 29, 5:54 pm, "John Briggs" <john.brig...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:FCS wrote:I wouldn't know. I've neither driven a vehicle
--Can't be that difficult, it's not like they have preselectionSurely a pre-selector box makes it easier to drive?
boxes these days.
with one nor an automatic. Double de-clutching
took a bit of time to get used to after a sycnhro-
Do you always post on subjects you know nothing about?
But this is Usenet. You need to ask?
.
- References:
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- From: John Briggs
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- From: FCS
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- From: John Briggs
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Prev by Date: Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Next by Date: Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Previous by thread: Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Next by thread: Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|