Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- From: "John Briggs" <john.briggs4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:11:17 GMT
FCS wrote:
On Jul 29, 4:30 pm, Blue Sow <janet.r...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
FCS wrote:
[snip]
Which part did you feel was 'metonymous'?
Perceptions of "public transport" as a genre.
As the word "metonymous" probably doesn't exist, I suppose that's as good an
answer as any. But what word did you really mean?
--
John Briggs
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- From: Richard Polhill
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- References:
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- From: Blue Sow
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- From: FCS
- Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Prev by Date: Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Next by Date: Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Previous by thread: Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Next by thread: Re: metonymous factors (or not) in humour
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|