Re: the or not to the ??

On Jul 9, 4:53 am, FCS <sipston_...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 12, 7:44 am, "mg" <geer...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





Newsgroups: rec.music.opera
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 6:59 PM
Subject: "The" Wigmore Hall

Can someone explain a particular matter of English usage to me? American
reviews and comments generally speak of Wigmore Hall, but in England it's
inevitably "The Wigmore Hall", although not always capitalized. What's
the
basis of the usage.
I don't think it's a Brit/American thing. Here in Los Angeles (THE
Angels) we say "The Hollywood Bowl" "The Greek Theatre" "The Dorothy
Chandler Pavillion". Even in New York they go to "The Met", but not
to "The Madison Square Garden" or "The Central Park".

Interesting thread. Who knows why we say things certain ways.

It just 'takes on'; people hear it, accept it, and so it goes, whether
it's necessarily 'more correct' or not.

It doesn't at all. Plenty of people go to Royal
Ascot, Wimbledon and The Grand National. Rather
more turned up to see the opening stages of The
Tour de France.

None of the usages you cite as quintessentially
"British" are so. From whom were they received?

Or possibly from whence were they received?

G DAEB

COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON
--- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, my guess is that the original poster,
albeit perhaps inhabiting a den beneath one
of the bridges mountain livestock use as to
cross rivers, is referring to a quite olden
range of texts and assuming we still (ever)
spoke like that.

A bit like reading Victorian-era works on a
dialect then leaving all knowledgable about
how racially superior Whites are.

So having established there are indeed very
very wrong answers in The Social Sciences I
shall move quickly on to jeer at the Yankee
branches of the same for still having texts
published post-Kennedy that say as much...

....alebit no kind of genocides were implied
during the composition of this post.

G DAEB

COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON
--

.