Re: Winning an argument, or losing without tricks
- From: John Dunlop <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 May 2007 01:46:46 -0700
tonyjeffs:
I'm arguing about something, and am being superficially defeated not
on the subject matter, but through tactics. I don't mind losing if
the other guy demonstrates a weakness in my argument, but don't want
to 'appear' to lose the point through tactics alone.
unless you feel at ease responding in kind, take Schopenhauer's
advice and avoid arguments with `the common ruck of people'; such
arguments will only drag you into chicanery.
i recommend _The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation_ by
Chaïm Perelmam and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, the depth and the
coverage of which surpasses that of _The Art of Controversy_.
--
Jock
.
- References:
- Winning an argument, or losing without tricks
- From: tonyjeffs
- Winning an argument, or losing without tricks
- Prev by Date: Re: protest/protest against
- Next by Date: Re: Winning an argument, or losing without tricks
- Previous by thread: Re: Winning an argument, or losing without tricks
- Next by thread: Re: Winning an argument, or losing without tricks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|