Re: For the nightemare

On Apr 19, 9:13 am, Blue Sow <b...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
FCS wrote:
On Apr 18, 11:21 pm, Blue Sow <b...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Changing the subject a moment, has this group experienced
cancelbot activity before? I followed-up to the irritated foreigner
earlier and it's gone now. There were angles nobody else had
covered as such.

'irritated foreigner'?
My software is set to discard messages after 30 days so if it was prior to that ...

The poster who wanted to know about whether or not
"opening an object" was good sense in English as, in
their own language, it seemed to them not logical.

Oh, and who were you implying I had plagiarised with your
shot about "original material" some time back?

I have no idea what this refers to. It is highly unlikely that I would imply
anyone had plagiarised anything - it would at best be impolite, and at worst be
potentially litigious.

It was one of the better cheap shots at my form
copyright declaration I've seen. Along the lines
of: material must be original in order for it to
be [...copyrightable...].

As far as I'm aware I was merely corresponding
in an on-line forum, representing myself and my
views and thoughts and opinions and suchlike
and nobody else/'s. As such I take miffage, so
to speak, that you seem to believe it lacks any
of the hallmarks of linguistic novelty that any
other utterance would.

Admittedly there's the technicality that what
makes any font recognisable is the uniformity
of its characters when compared to the variety
in all but the most accomplished calligraphy.

And then there's the fact that I could ask you
to write out 500 times "Daeb is NOT a plagiarist"
and whether you did this by hand or typed it up
(I'm assuming you don't use speech-to-text)
the parametric values of the electrical impulses
fired by your brain when viewed on a timeline
would, still, be unique as any fingerprint.

There's then the paralinguistic element that
even a musician playing perfectly from score
night-in night-out may not be wearing the
same facial expression, or a costume which
fits quite so well as the one at the cleaners,
and may well be triggering linguistic impulses
at a neuronic level depending on whether a
particular dog came first or fourth in the 4:17
at Walthamstow.

All material not originated by myself was, of
course, clearly and unambiguously attributed
by way of auto-generated chevrons in the left.

--
Blue Sow

G DAEB

COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON
--

.