Re: Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- From: "Mark Wallace" <mwallace@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:01:23 +0200
"Blue Sow" <blue@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:462699e2$0$10738$db0fefd9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Romans copied the PROCESS of crucifixion from other cultures and
indeed coined that word to describe that process.
Not quite. It's just that we now use a Latin-derived word for it. We could
just as easily have ripped a word from another language (English is English,
after all).
But this is an extremely dull discussion; best left for dead.
.
- References:
- Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- From: Acrux
- Re: Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- From: Blue Sow
- Re: Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- From: David
- Re: Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- From: FCS
- Re: Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- From: Blue Sow
- Re: Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- From: FCS
- Re: Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- From: Blue Sow
- Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- Prev by Date: Re: For the nightemare
- Next by Date: Re: For the nightemare
- Previous by thread: Re: Easter 2007 - Jesus, Myth of History or Son of God?
- Next by thread: Shakespearean curses - dizzy-eyed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|