Re: in or on the lists
- From: Blue Sow <blue@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:22:51 +0000
Mike Stevens wrote:
Peter Duncanson wrote:
Any idea how to set up such a search so that it searches currentNo.
usage while ignoring current abusage?
How do you define the difference?
Define the difference? It is easier to just define the words. I described what I meant by 'abusage' above.
How about "abusage is a usage I don't like"?
No, that would not appear to be a reasonable definition, although I have no idea of your likes and dislikes.
--
Blue Sow
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: in or on the lists
- From: Mike Stevens
- Re: in or on the lists
- References:
- in or on the lists
- From: MDM
- Re: in or on the lists
- From: Blue Sow
- Re: in or on the lists
- From: Peter Duncanson
- Re: in or on the lists
- From: Blue Sow
- Re: in or on the lists
- From: Peter Duncanson
- Re: in or on the lists
- From: Mike Stevens
- in or on the lists
- Prev by Date: Re: Capiltalisation
- Next by Date: Re: Capiltalisation
- Previous by thread: Re: in or on the lists
- Next by thread: Re: in or on the lists
- Index(es):