Re: Unknown client but need referees
- From: mhalesy@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 Dec 2006 09:14:02 -0800
Nope, referees are never required, and the agent is just trawling for
leads.
The sensible answer in this case is to say that your referees have
asked that you do not give their name out because they get sick of the
calls, but say that you would be happy to break that rule and share
plenty of lead information with them after they have secured a position
for you. This keeps their interest and they will consider you someone
they can work with. Better than telling them where to go!
The basics and more gotchas of dealing with agents can be found here:
http://www.contractorcalculator.co.uk/negotiating_rates_agents_building_relationships.aspx
BrowneIssue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I have just been assured by "the country's biggest recruitment agency"
that it is normal practice for agents to need referees but refuse to
say who the client is.
All the advice here has been not to fall for this trick. So I
declined.
The agent was adamant that this is how it contractor recruitment works
"I think you'll find it is the same with every agency".
The explanation was that because they are the sole agency (the client
is supposedly "a local authority" - since when could the public sector
use just one supplier for recruitment?) I don't need to know who the
client is and that it is normal in consultancy to not reveal your
clients.
Can someone please confirm: is it me that is in the wrong? Should I
have provided the referees details without knowing who the client is?
.
- References:
- Unknown client but need referees
- From: BrowneIssue
- Unknown client but need referees
- Prev by Date: Re: VAT in advertised rates
- Next by Date: Re: Is it legal for agencies to post jobs that don't exist ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Unknown client but need referees
- Next by thread: Is it legal for agencies to post jobs that don't exist ?
- Index(es):