Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: William <william2921aa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 18:58:50 GMT
"William" <william2921aa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:73bm62lo7ovj36tk9507vgo13huf5vj4fi@xxxxxxxxxx
Therefore I would like to publicly apologise to users who considered myactions
to be in-appropiate.signed
In mitigation, I was and still am very annoyed with Aria, who I feel have
treated myself and it seems many others too, rather badly.
I have today received paperwork from my credit card company which I have
and returned, in order that they can affect a chargeback to Aria.
I have just noticed this addition to the thread. As you have now
acknowledged that your original behaviour was wrong I will stop yanking your
chain. I suggest that you stop responding to any further posts in the
threads that you have created and just let the matter drop. Usenet users
have very short memories (unless dealing with repeat offenders) so you can
post again soon without worrying too much about people having a go at you.
I have acknowledged on more than one occasion in here that my using the aliases
was stupid and wrong and was out of character for me. I just let my anger get
the better of me. Sorry for the comments I made to you personally Tony.. I take
them back.
I will not post further on this subject.
Best wishes.
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: TMack
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- References:
- ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: Ahmadinejad
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: Conor
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: William
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: Conor
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: TMack
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: William
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: TMack
- ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Prev by Date: Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Next by Date: Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Previous by thread: Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Next by thread: Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|