Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: "TMack" <REMOVETHECAPStonymackin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:59:46 +0100
"William" <william2921aa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:se4p62tu5mndrhptra46r7pocc8desppnp@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 18 May 2006 07:16:32 +0100, Chronos <chronos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
SNIP!
experienceUnfortunately, you lost the right to receive the benefit of that
resentwhen you crossed the line into dishonesty.
May I suggest you change that last word to 'devious' or something similar.
I do not accept that by using multiple alias I am dishonest and strongly
your slanderous suggestion that I am dishonest, and request you retractthe
statement.
Not only are you dishonest but you are obviously stupid too. Apart from the
fact that you are in no position to request anything, you have no
understanding of what "dishonest" means or of what "slanderous" means
either. If, as I suspect, you mean "libellous" rather than "slanderous"
then who exactly might have been libelled - Willaim, Bill, Roger Getteridge
or Ahmadinejad???? How do you think a court might view the use of
"dishonest" as a description of someone who has posed as 4 different people?
SNIP!
As long as the allegations are true, nonames,
offence has been committed. Yes it was childish and devious to use alias
but was it dishonest.. NO.
Yep, VERY stupid. If you tell lies, if you use deceit to try to achieve
your aims - that makes you dishonest. Its as simple as that.
--
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: William
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- References:
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: Conor
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: William
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: Conor
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: TMack
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: TMack
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: William
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: TMack
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: Chronos
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- From: William
- Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Prev by Date: Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Next by Date: Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Previous by thread: Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Next by thread: Re: ARIA TECNOLGY NO GOOD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|