Re: stuff-uk.net - - Horrible service, AVOID THEM!!


"Rob S" <robatworkDeleteTheseFourWords@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43c4de12.489176875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 11 Jan 2006 01:22:33 -0800, as@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> <some stuff>
>
> Blimey another head above the parapit.
>
> Whilst not commenting on this case at all, I would just like to say that
> it's
> always very welcome to see one of the "vendors" represented in here - I
> hope you
> stick it out. Unfortunately most seem to have a v short stay (dabs) or a
> long
> and fruitful one (Rob from aria) until they jack it in.
>
> regards
>


Now that the barrack room lawyers have waded in with the 'contract is with
you' screaming, I doubt we'll see stuff-uk back here again.

Where is it that common sense just disappears when folks begin to discuss
'the law', especially from non-lawyers, and especially when its a case that
does not involve them directly?

I'm astounded at how this thread developed, given every one of those
sceaming to defend Jame's legal rights will proactively check with
manufacturers anyway if they cant get kit to work out of the box!!!

sheesh,
g.


.

Relevant Pages