Re: Tungsten E v Zire 72

ciqret wrote:
> I'm considering a Tungsten E or perhaps a Zire 72.
>
> Feature for feature and quality for quality what is missing from the
> Tungsten E that the Zire 72 has?
>
> Are there even some things that the Tungsten E has but which the Zire
> 72 is missing?
>
> One thing I do know is that the E has no camera, but that is ok as I
> don't want that. What else?

I've just compared a Tungsten E2 and Zire 72 myself... From reviews, I've
seen that the E2 is a bit slower, but has a better screen, non-volotile
memory and a much longer battery life. Like you, I dont need the camera, so
it was an easy choice, especially since the 72 was 40 euro's more
expensive...

When you look at the Tungsten 'E', I guess it's a different comparison. If I
were you, I'd check out the E2.
--
Thomas


.