Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: real-address-in-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rowland McDonnell)
- Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 02:38:13 +0100
Woody <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[snip]
Woody <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So there is a lookup table
Lookup table as a concept, I understand. I don't see how this works,
though.
why?
Because of everything that has impinged upon the here&now, obviously.
[snip](using the one from my firefox for pc, as I
use firefox on windows):
key value
audio/3gpp npqtplugin4.dll
audio/ac3 npqtplugin3.dll
audio/acc npqtplugin3.dll
image/pict npqtplugin6.dll
image/png npqtplugin6.dll
image/jp2 npqtplugin7.dll
application/futuresplash NPSWF32.dll
application/pdf nppdf32.dll
application/xaml+xml NPWPF.dll
application/x-java-bean npjp2.dll
Literally that label, no processing of it.
So what you're saying is that there's no meaning to the two-partness of
the label? If so, why does it look like it ought to bear meaning at
least to a human being?
I said, there is no meaning for the computer other than as a label. For
a human it makes it easier to get through the list.
Okay, so how does that work?
Rowland.
--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
.
- References:
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Woody
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Woody
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Woody
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Woody
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Woody
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Woody
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Woody
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- From: Woody
- Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- Prev by Date: Re: Dad's new machine software requirements.
- Next by Date: Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- Previous by thread: Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- Next by thread: Re: Firefox and rendering JPEG2000s
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|