Re: OT: TV Licencing
- From: real-not-anti-spam-address@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (D.M. Procida)
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:51:53 +0000
Graham J <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"D.M. Procida" <real-not-anti-spam-address@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:1ivem1c.xbx3li1qohubeN%real-not-anti-spam-address@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
James Jolley <jrjolley@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi folks,
This is wildly OT but I wanted to run this by folk, mostly because i'm
still in shock and could do with the support.
Why not ask on uk.legal.moderated? That's where you will get some proper
advice instead of stupid comments, and you won't run the risk of
irritating powerful easily-angered people like me.
Who says you're powerful?
OK, try this. We'll do a Venn diagram. Draw the set of people who have
really irritated me. Draw the set of people who are still alive.
Notice how they fail to intersect?
It's very unwise to mess with people whose Venn diagrams look like that.
Daniele
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: TV Licencing
- From: zoara
- Re: OT: TV Licencing
- From: Phillip Walters
- Re: OT: TV Licencing
- References:
- OT: TV Licencing
- From: James Jolley
- Re: OT: TV Licencing
- From: D.M. Procida
- Re: OT: TV Licencing
- From: Graham J
- OT: TV Licencing
- Prev by Date: Much cheapness - iPhone bits
- Next by Date: Re: OT: TV Licencing
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: TV Licencing
- Next by thread: Re: OT: TV Licencing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|