Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- From: Chris Ridd <chrisridd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 17:01:51 +0100
On 2008-07-06 16:44:59 +0100, James Jolley <james.jolley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
On 2008-07-04 13:01:13 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd@xxxxxxx> said:
That doesn't mean too much. SMART reports a lot of false negatives, to borrow a phrase.Interesting. I'd always been told that smart status is super and it works more or less as you 'd expect. Is it generally useless then?
If SMART says your drive is failing it almost certainly is failing, so that's useful. But drives can fail silently without SMART noticing.
Google did some research into this. There's a summary at <http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070225-8917.html> but maybe the original article is worth a read too <Failure Trends in a Large Disk Drive Population>
Cheers,
Chris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- From: Chris Ridd
- Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- References:
- Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- From: Graham J
- Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- From: Chris Ridd
- Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- From: James Jolley
- Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- Prev by Date: Re: Help! iLamp won't restart!
- Next by Date: Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- Previous by thread: Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- Next by thread: Re: Reproducible no boot with damaged disk
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|