Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Tim Streater <tim.streater@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:26:04 +0100
In article
<4f4f1d34-5f57-4673-96ad-77ff8582c031@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Sak Wathanasin <sw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 25 Apr, 11:49, Tim Streater <tim.strea...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When I was at SLAC 20 years ago and unix arrived, there were arguments
about which editor should be the standard recommended: vi, ed, emacs,
jove, etc (is etc an editor? - hmmm).
I have an internal Bell Labs memo that argues the case for "vi" over
"ed": goes into great detail about many extra CPU cycles vi would use
up vs the time saved to "novices". I think it was as late as 1981. I
kept it as I thought it was hilarious - it prob cost them more to
produce that memo than they ever lost in CPU time.
When I was a boy, a CPU cycle was really valuable. Look how they've been
devalued over the years. They're only worth about a five-hundredth of
what they were worth then.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- References:
- non-moan about scrolling
- From: Pd
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: zoara
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Pd
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Tim Streater
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Jim
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Ian McCall
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Peter Ceresole
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Tim Streater
- Re: non-moan about scrolling
- From: Sak Wathanasin
- non-moan about scrolling
- Prev by Date: Re: Hardy Heron
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] BBC Radiophonic Workshop
- Previous by thread: Re: non-moan about scrolling
- Next by thread: Re: non-moan about scrolling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|