Re: Oh why did Apple dump IBM....



Bruce Horrocks wrote:
David Kennedy wrote:
<http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?email&NewsID=19867>

"could be implemented in chips within 10 to 12 years, he said."

I think that there will be plenty of time for Apple to get pally with IBM again if needs be.


It's a pity they didn't stick with Power 6/Power 7 for high end stuff like Xserves and just use Intel for the consumer stuff. Developers are going to have to produce universal binaries for some years to come anyway so it wouldn't hurt to have a dual architecture product range for the indefinite future.

Oh well, we can dream...

Paul
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Oh why did Apple dump IBM....
    ... On 6/12/07 16:13, Bruce Horrocks wrote: ... I think that there will be plenty of time for Apple to get pally with IBM again if needs be. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Oh why did Apple dump IBM....
    ... I think that there will be plenty of time for Apple to get pally with ... IBM again if needs be. ... Intel chips. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Oh why did Apple dump IBM....
    ... I think that there will be plenty of time for Apple to get pally with ... IBM again if needs be. ... Intel chips. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Oh why did Apple dump IBM....
    ... I think that there will be plenty of time for Apple to get pally with ... IBM again if needs be. ... Intel chips. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: vista update stopping emails
    ... the cafe is using to reset the state of the machines between users. ... IBM came to visit him. ... asked him if he had an operating system for it to run under. ... Contrast Apple. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)