Re: OT: A Google funny.....

Woody <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Woody <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Woody <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Umm. So you're ignorant, yes? That's a separate issue to the
abbreviation lark, innit?

[snip]

Your problem, Peter, is that you've got an automatic downer on
anything from these septic isles and tend to assume that it's
better abroad especially if `abroad' is France or the USA, I've
noticed.

And your problem appears to be the oposite.

Eh? Are you mad? Yes, you are.

Sorry - my mistake. I forgot that if people disagree with you you go
straight to insults.

<puzzled> In what way is that insulting?

Calling someone mad?

That's quite reasonable if someone makes an insulting and lunatic
suggestion, which is what you did.

I'm certainly being very much
less rude and insulting than you were to me in the post I was replying
to.

Is it? In what way?

Making out that I'm a nationalist bigot.

If my carefully jocular response to your gratuitously /deeply/ insulting
post directed at me is going to get that sort of reaction - well, get
off your high bloody horse, sonny boy.

Why so damned touchy?

Because practically any conversation with you ends up with you being
insulting and I think I shouldn't get into this.

No, it ends up with you taking offence. *I* don't think I was being
insulting - just responding in a fairly reasonable fashion to a
suggestion of yours that I found quite unpleasant.

So yes, it is my fault for bringing previous history into the way I read
your posts, which I shouldn't have done.

[snip]

Usually a bad idea.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
.

Relevant Pages