Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: wildrover.andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Andy Hewitt)
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:15:27 +0100
Ian Robinson <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:02:24 +0100, Rowland McDonnell wrote
(in article
<1hxcygz.16h084ii9an36N%real-address-in-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
<crooked grin>
Oh yeah? Prove it?
You'll have to take it on trust!
P.S. Nobody worry: I've got the best part of 4 billions years' worth of
evolution stopping me stopping.
Probably closer to 1 billion. Around the time when multicellular
organisms arose and had the equipment to "think" about the environment
they found themselves in.
Well, a little googling finds first life of any kind was about 3.7
billion years ago. Life that had DNA was 1.5 billion years ago, and
reproductive life that became mobile was about 400 million years ago.
first life on land was about 370 million years ago. Animal life started
around 225 million years ago, and mammals appeared around 65 million
years ago. Man only appeared around 100,000 years ago.
--
Andy Hewitt
<http://web.mac.com/andrewhewitt1/>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Ian Robinson
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- References:
- Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Kit
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Tim Auton
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Ian Robinson
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: David Kennedy
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Ian Robinson
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Rowland McDonnell
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Ian Robinson
- Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Prev by Date: Re: iDVD chapters/scenes
- Next by Date: Re: A horror story.
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|