Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: "Since when?" <guess@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:54:30 +0100
"Nigel Eastmond" <eastmond.news1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eastmond.news1-98E70E.22522729042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
E.
I am essentially an 'outsider'. But I have used this NG since oh, 1992
or so. It's just I don't have the time to post frequently. Frequent
posting is often the key to an NG.
Nige. telling fibs
This group didn't exist in 1992.
Ask Rowland when it formed - he was here then,
It was late nineties.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Nigel Eastmond
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- References:
- Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Kit
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Ian Robinson
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: eastender
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Nigel Eastmond
- Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Next by Date: Re: SPOILER: Bahrain, and the season so far.
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Index(es):
