Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Nigel Eastmond <eastmond.news1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:52:27 +0100
In article <eastend-4CCC6E.21440329042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
eastender <eastend@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <0001HW.C25A38210007F943B019F94F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ian Robinson <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However I don't think there is a bar to new posters to the group who
contribute becoming regulars. Joining the "clique" if you like. Always
assuming that's what they want to do. It isn't always the case.
Being a Mac user is being part of a clique in any case. But like all
groups there are 20% who talk and dominate and 80% who lurk and shuffle
around in the background. That aside, posting a basic technical query
here usually has a result - saved my bacon more than a few times.
E.
I am essentially an 'outsider'. But I have used this NG since oh, 1992
or so. It's just I don't have the time to post frequently. Frequent
posting is often the key to an NG.
Nige.
--
Nigel C Eastmond
eastmond.news1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.eastmond.org.uk
Remove the bodily organs from my email address to reply
"Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from email."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: David Kennedy
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Since when?
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- References:
- Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Kit
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Ian Robinson
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: eastender
- Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT-ish: Targus Laptop Bags
- Next by Date: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
