Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: eastender <eastend@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:44:03 GMT
In article <0001HW.C25A38210007F943B019F94F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ian Robinson <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However I don't think there is a bar to new posters to the group who
contribute becoming regulars. Joining the "clique" if you like. Always
assuming that's what they want to do. It isn't always the case.
Being a Mac user is being part of a clique in any case. But like all
groups there are 20% who talk and dominate and 80% who lurk and shuffle
around in the background. That aside, posting a basic technical query
here usually has a result - saved my bacon more than a few times.
E.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Nigel Eastmond
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- References:
- Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Kit
- Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- From: Ian Robinson
- Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Next by Date: Re: Mac RPG
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this group really as clique as it appears?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
