Re: Apple and EMI

Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ekul Namsob <notmyaddress.1.ekulnamsob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

" [...] EMI will be offered at higher quality 256 kbps AAC encoding,
resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording,
[...] "

And *THAT* is an outrageous lie. 320 kb/s AAC is easy to distinguish[1]
from a non-lossy-compressed version even with my (almost) 40 year old
years.

[snip]

Rowland.

[1] Admittedly, you need decent reproduction, but a 2GB iPod Nano with
Sennheiser PX100 headphones[2] is plenty good enough to hear the
difference clearly.

I'll wager you never tested it with a good double blind set-up,

Jan
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Apple and EMI
    ... J. J. Lodder wrote: ... resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording ... I'll wager you never tested it with a good double blind set-up, ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Apple and EMI
    ... J. J. Lodder wrote: ... resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording, ... I'll wager you never tested it with a good double blind set-up, ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Apple and EMI
    ... resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording ... I'll wager you never tested it with a good double blind set-up, ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Apple and EMI
    ... Ekul Namsob wrote: ... resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording, ... I.e., not an expensive rig. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: In the News: Darwin Only Had A Theology Degree
    ... snip ignored posting ... BET is racism ... I'll wager he doesn't know. ...
    (talk.origins)