Re: Apple and EMI

Ekul Namsob <notmyaddress.1.ekulnamsob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

" [...] EMI will be offered at higher quality 256 kbps AAC encoding,
resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording,
[...] "

And *THAT* is an outrageous lie. 320 kb/s AAC is easy to distinguish[1]
from a non-lossy-compressed version even with my (almost) 40 year old
years.

[snip]

Rowland.

[1] Admittedly, you need decent reproduction, but a 2GB iPod Nano with
Sennheiser PX100 headphones[2] is plenty good enough to hear the
difference clearly.

[2] I.e., not an expensive rig.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Apple and EMI
    ... J. J. Lodder wrote: ... resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording ... I'll wager you never tested it with a good double blind set-up, ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Apple and EMI
    ... J. J. Lodder wrote: ... resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording, ... I'll wager you never tested it with a good double blind set-up, ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Apple and EMI
    ... resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording ... I'll wager you never tested it with a good double blind set-up, ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Apple and EMI
    ... resulting in audio quality indistinguishable from the original recording, ... I'll wager you never tested it with a good double blind set-up, ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Black Ice
    ... Rob Morley wrote: ... notmyaddress.1.ekulnamsob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ekul Namsob ... exile in Lancashire ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)