Re: Maybe overzealous?
- From: orthocross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:13:18 -0700
On Fri, 19 May 2006 09:09:15 +0100, Paul Russell <prussell@xxxxxxxxx>
Why would anyone actually give a rat's ass whether your filters (or
yourself) are "over-zealous"?
It's your newsreader (and ultimately, yourself) which the filters are
affecting, not ours.
But I have found for myself that shutting out others I dislike only
leads me further into misunderstanding. As they say, "the key to
getting along is communication".
If you shut the door to communication, you progressively isolate
yourself from everyone else.
But do what you want to do. No one really cares.
Obivously you /do/ care, because you've changed your nym as more and
more people have killfiled your old persona.
I don't really care who killfiles me. I don't live for thei approval,
nor do I really want it. I will post no matter what. PERIOD. So get
used to it, stud.
Sir, I ALWAYS sign my postings, with my TRUE NAME, Donald L. McDaniel.
Where I live orany other personal information is NO BODY'S business
but my own. In addition, I have no desire to have my Inbox filled up
with useless crap and viruses, and other evil crap. People such as
yourself on the Internet are EVIL to the core.
Donald L McDaniel
Please reply to the original newsgroup and thread,
so that the conversation may continue undisturbed.
- Prev by Date: Re: Using Dot Mac to host password protected content
- Next by Date: Re: iMovie and FW video
- Previous by thread: Re: Maybe overzealous?
- Next by thread: Re: Maybe overzealous?